Artefact vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Artefact (4.3/5) edges ahead of Addepto (3.8/5) overall. Artefact is the better choice for european consumer and retail brands, strategy through build. Addepto is the stronger option for manufacturers wanting a small first AI engagement. The right choice depends on the size of your program, your budget, and whether you want the same firm to build what it recommends.
Artefact vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Artefact | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| HQ | Paris, France | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 1,700+ | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Data and AI consulting from strategy partners and engineers in one firm, with a wide European base | Low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries |
| Pricing model | Consulting fees per engagement; rates not published | $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); project-based |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | Google Cloud, Azure, AWS | Databricks, Azure, AWS |
| Industries served | Consumer goods, Retail, Luxury, Financial services, Healthcare, Telecom | Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics, Retail, Financial services |
Artefact vs Addepto: overview
Artefact
Artefact was founded in Paris in 2014 and now employs more than 1,700 people in 31 offices across 25 countries. In 2025 private equity firm Cinven bought a majority stake that valued the business at over €1 billion, and Artefact has said it plans to triple in size by 2030 through hiring and acquisitions. Consulting partners handle AI strategy and data governance while its engineers build data platforms and models, so one firm covers the route from roadmap to production. Most clients are large consumer, retail, and luxury brands. Think of it as a European management consultancy with a much bigger data bench than usual.
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2017 and was acquired in December 2025 by KMS Technology, an Atlanta digital engineering company backed by Sunstone Partners. Its chief executive says 97% of the team are AI engineers (per company website; independently unverifiable). It sells AI consulting and roadmaps for data-heavy industries such as manufacturing and aviation, followed by builds. Clutch lists $50–$99 an hour and a $10,000+ minimum project, so a small first engagement is possible.
Services and capabilities: Artefact vs Addepto
| Capability | Artefact | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness assessment | ✗ | ✓ |
| Use-case prioritization | ✗ | ✗ |
| TCO / ROI modeling | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI governance & EU AI Act | ✓ | ✗ |
| Build vs. buy advice | ✗ | ✗ |
| Audit of live AI programs | ✗ | ✗ |
| Change management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Can build what it recommends | ✓ | ✓ |
Frameworks and platforms: Artefact vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | Artefact | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | ✓ | N/A |
| GDPR | ✓ | N/A |
| NIST AI RMF | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | ✓ | N/A |
| Databricks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Snowflake | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Artefact vs Addepto
| Criterion | Artefact | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Strategy & roadmap engagement, Delivery team, Ongoing advisory | Readiness assessment, Strategy & roadmap engagement, Delivery team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Artefact vs Addepto
| Dimension | Artefact | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer goods, Retail, Luxury | Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics |
| Best use cases | Building a data and AI roadmap for a consumer brand selling in several European markets., Setting up data governance before expanding marketing AI. | A small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer., Predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. |
| Typical project type | Strategy & roadmap engagement | Readiness assessment |
Artefact vs Addepto: pros and cons
| Artefact | |
|---|---|
| + | Strategy partners and data engineers work in one firm, so the plan and the build share owners |
| + | Offices in 25 countries help companies running AI programs across several markets |
| + | Runs its own training school (Artefact School of Data) for client teams |
| + | Deep experience with consumer and retail brands on marketing and customer data |
| - | Majority-owned by Cinven since 2025, with an acquisition-led growth plan that may reshape teams and focus |
| - | Clients skew toward large brands, so smaller companies may find engagements heavier than they need |
| - | Less visible in industrial and manufacturing AI than in consumer sectors |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | A $10,000+ Clutch minimum allows a small first step |
| + | Team is almost entirely engineers, so roadmaps stay technically grounded |
| + | Experience with manufacturing and aviation data |
| + | Databricks experience for data platform work |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025, and integration may change teams and priorities |
| - | Strategy work is mostly a front end to engineering |
| - | Little governance or change-management work |
Who should choose Artefact?
A typical fit: building a data and AI roadmap for a consumer brand selling in several European markets.
Data and AI consulting from strategy partners and engineers in one firm, with a wide European base. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer goods, Retail, Luxury, Financial services, Healthcare, Telecom.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: a small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer.
Low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics, Retail, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Artefact vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| Your board wants a costed, sequenced roadmap within a quarter | Neither lists cost modeling; ask for a sample roadmap |
| You already run AI that is missing its targets | Neither offers a separate audit; ask for a scoped review |
| Regulators will ask how each AI system is governed | Artefact |
| AI will change roles and processes for many staff | Neither; plan change management separately |
| You want the strategy firm to build the result too | Both can deliver after the strategy |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Artefact (Not disclosed) vs Addepto ($10,000+ (Clutch)) |
| You need a large team across many countries | Artefact |
Use case fit: Artefact vs Addepto
| Use case | Artefact fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a data and AI roadmap for a consumer brand selling in several European markets. | Strong | Limited | Artefact |
| Setting up data governance before expanding marketing AI. | Strong | Limited | Artefact |
| A small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: Artefact vs Addepto
Artefact (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Strategy Consulting projects. Data and AI consulting from strategy partners and engineers in one firm, with a wide European base.
Addepto (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Artefact vs Addepto FAQ
Is Artefact better than Addepto?
Artefact (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Artefact's strongest advantage: strategy partners and data engineers work in one firm, so the plan and the build share owners. Addepto's strongest advantage: a $10,000+ Clutch minimum allows a small first step.
How do Artefact and Addepto differ in pricing?
Artefact's pricing: consulting fees per engagement; rates not published. Addepto's pricing: $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); project-based with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: Artefact or Addepto?
Artefact is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultant before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Artefact and Addepto?
Artefact's primary differentiator is: data and AI consulting from strategy partners and engineers in one firm, with a wide European base. Addepto's primary differentiator is: low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries. They also differ in team size (1,700+ vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Consumer goods, Retail vs Manufacturing, Aviation).
Verify all details directly with each consultant before making a decision.